Some FIRE Thoughts

Financial Independence, Retire Early (FIRE) is a lifestyle centered around frugal living and aggressive saving. As the name suggests, the goal is to stop working as soon as possible, most aiming by their 30s. The movement has a lot of fanfare with millennials. And as with anything popular with Gen Y, criticism has been prominent.

The math is simple. Figure out your annual spend, divide it by your safe withdrawal rate (most use 4%) and you have your FIRE number - a portfolio balance big enough to generate returns that can cover your expenses. Say you spend $20K a year. With a 4% withdrawal rate, you'll need $500K to retire. Easy.

This is usually where the criticism kicks in. The math is fixed, too clean. Returns and expenses are not. The markets are a mystery and life even more so. An extended downturn or a large medical bill can easily throw off your plan.

The second tier of criticism is more personal. Why work a job you hate? Why deprive yourself? Why aim to sit around all day? Why not simply do something you enjoy?

These are valid questions, but I think they only apply in the extreme. Most in the FIRE pursuit don't hate their jobs, they just want more control of their time. Most aren't depriving themselves, they're just mindful with their spending. Most don't long for a couch potato life, they just want to do things that may not make as much money.

The math isn't perfect and the lifestyle isn't for everyone, but we can all learn from the principles of FIRE. Living below your means and building a margin of safety is powerful. Money doesn't buy happiness but it does buy options.

When financially stable, you're able to operate from a place of abundance. Being able work because you want to, not because you need to. I think that's what FIRE is really about. Not ruthlessly saving so you can one day do nothing. But getting to a place where you have the freedom to choose. Not all of us want to RE, but we all can benefit from a little FI.

Comments

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event. Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback. Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes.

Today's Special: Humble Pie

You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark. Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer. Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong. "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail. "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on. When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...

Herman Ye

Search