Bitcoin - Money, Investment, Gold?

Bitcoin's a fascinating story. So much has happened in its short existence. Price explosions (and crashes), debates about the future of money, the emergence of an infinite universe of cryptocurrencies and crypto-related businesses. Despite Bitcoin's impact, I still have a hard time getting the point of it.

Born in 2009, Bitcoin was a response to the Great Financial Crisis. Massive bailouts raised a lot of concerns about the stability of money. Backed by code and free from human messiness, it was supposed to be the new standard - decentralized and incorruptible. Unfortunately, it hasn't played out this way.

Adoption's been weak. There's no incentive for businesses to accept it or for consumers to use it. Good ol' cash is easy, so why bother?

Bitcoin is volatile. It's extremely inflationary and deflationary, able to move violently in either direction in moments. Money needs to be stable, no one can make rational spending decisions otherwise.

Plus, it's technically limited. Bitcoin can only process about 5 transactions per second. In comparison, Visa can process 24,000. It's not fit for a widely used currency.

Running up against these drawbacks, advocates have shifted Bitcoin's narrative from being money to being an investment or a store of value. Sadly, it doesn't do well here either.

The value of stocks and bonds comes from future cash flows - whether it is from owning a piece of a company's earnings or from being owe interest. Bitcoin has no cash flows. Its value only comes from what someone else is willing to pay for it. Purely speculative.

As a store of value, it's too volatile (see above). You're not storing value if it can crash at any moment.

I'm not anti-Bitcoin. I think it's really interesting. When you learn more about it, it's a technical marvel. Cleverly solving for decentralized trust, a problem that's stumped really smart people for a long time. However, from a financial use perspective, I just don't get it.

Comments

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event. Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback. Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes.

Bias For Clarity

Bias for action. Gets things done. Go-getter. Traits companies big and small look for. And for good reason, you're being hired to do things! However, action is a secondary step that often overshadows the primary step, direction. Clear direction is the foundation that enables our actions to takeoff. Without it, we're stuck in the mud. Striving for clarity is an underrated skill. Having the courage to ask ( seemingly ) obvious questions, and to check in, making sure we're all on the same page. "O bvious " questions are a low risk, high reward way to add value. At worst, you'll add confidence to our actions. At best, you discover a misalignment that saves us from a dead-end. The more people, the more clear we need to be. The bigger the initiative, the bigger the risk of reaching the finish line, only to realize expectations were off. Success is always uncertain. But we can be certain about what we want and what everyone's job is. Things that can be clea...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer. Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong. "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail. "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on. When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...

Herman Ye

Search