Advisor or Salesperson?

Walk into any bank branch. Ask for investment advice and you'll be directed to one of their "advisors". Advisors is in quotes because most don't actually give much advice.

Financial advisor is a loosely regulated job title. Unlike doctors, accountants and lawyers, advisors aren't required to undergo years of training and education. Look up job postings on Linkedin and you'll see most don't require a college degree. Pass a licensing exam or two and you're in.
These exams represent the bare minimum in financial knowledge and on their own hardly qualifies someone to provide advice.

Look even closer and you'll notice most positions are commission-based. So the motivation is not to help you but to drive you towards the most profitable products. This means high-fees and overly-complex strategies, which typically equals poor performance.

In addition, most advisors are not held to any fiduciary duty. Meaning they are not required to look after your best interest. This plus the commissions is a recipe for super bias advice.

There are good financial advisors out there, you just need to do your research. Don't simply settle for the first one to smile at you. Look at qualifications and understand incentives.

How much experience do they have?

What is their education level? Any designations?

How do they get paid? Are they fees-based or commissions-based?

Can they provide references?

Ideally you'll want someone with at least 5 years of experience, have a degree in finance or accounting and have acronyms like CFP (Certified Financial Planner), CFA (Certified Financial Analyst) or CPA (Certified Professional Accountant) next to their name.

You'll want someone who's fees-based. Meaning they get paid the same regardless of what products they sell. This removes the conflict of interest inherit with commissions.

You'll also want references from existing and past clients. You're hiring someone for an important job, be thorough. Shop around to find the right one.

None of the above guarantee the perfect advisor but will help you ask the right questions and get you going in the right direction.

Comments

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event. Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback. Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes.

Bias For Clarity

Bias for action. Gets things done. Go-getter. Traits companies big and small look for. And for good reason, you're being hired to do things! However, action is a secondary step that often overshadows the primary step, direction. Clear direction is the foundation that enables our actions to takeoff. Without it, we're stuck in the mud. Striving for clarity is an underrated skill. Having the courage to ask ( seemingly ) obvious questions, and to check in, making sure we're all on the same page. "O bvious " questions are a low risk, high reward way to add value. At worst, you'll add confidence to our actions. At best, you discover a misalignment that saves us from a dead-end. The more people, the more clear we need to be. The bigger the initiative, the bigger the risk of reaching the finish line, only to realize expectations were off. Success is always uncertain. But we can be certain about what we want and what everyone's job is. Things that can be clea...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer. Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong. "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail. "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on. When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...

Herman Ye

Search