Leveraged ETFs For Buy-&-Hold Investors?

Leverage is powerful. It's even been argued that it should be a consideration for young investors. Given all the hype, buy-and-hold investors are trying to figure out how to get in on the action. ETFs are great, so would leveraged ETFs be even better?

First, What Are Leveraged ETFs?

Traditional ETFs look to match the returns of an index, leveraged ETFs look to amplify them.

SPY, a traditional index ETF is designed to match the returns of the S&P 500, SPXL, a tripled levered ETF looks to 3X them!

This is achieved through the use of debt and derivatives. The math to enable this is rather complicated and can leave you scratching your head.

Long Term Leveraged Investing

Over the long term, markets have historically returned about 10% a year. If we used a leveraged ETF, couldn't we get 30%? If this sounds too good to be true, because it is.

ETFs like SPXL do provide 3X returns, but only for a single day. Leverage ETFs are rebalanced daily, meaning the tracking will melt away for any period beyond that. This causes wild performance gaps between a levered and traditional ETF following the same index.

Let's say on Monday, at market open you invest $300 into 1 share of SPY and $300 into 1 share of SPXL.

Monday:

The S&P 500 rises 10%

SPY = 300 + 10% = $330
SPYXL = 300 + 30% = $390

Tuesday:

The S&P 500 drops 10%

SPY = $330 - 10% = $297
SPYXL = $390 - 10% = $273

On Monday, SPYXL perfectly replicated a 3X return of the index, hooray! However, when held for an additional day, you start to see the decay.

Over the two day period, the S&P 500 dropped in value by 1% ( $300 to $297). Logically, you'd think SPXL dropped by 3%.

In practice, SPXL dropped by a whopping 9% ($300 to $273). In only two days, the decay lead to such a wild deviation from the underlying index. It'll only get worse over time.

Keep It Simple

Leveraged ETFs were not built for buy-and-hold investors. These were made for speculators who want to trade in and out of the market. Unlike with traditional ETFs, you can't truly be passive. You'll need to constantly monitor your position (or risk losing a ton).

Fees are also a factor. Given all complexity involved in levered products, they cost a lot more to manage. SPY has an expense ratio of 0.0945%, while SPYXL costs 1.01%. That's more than 10 times the price!

When it comes to long term investing, it's best to keep it simple.

Comments

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event. Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback. Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes.

Bias For Clarity

Bias for action. Gets things done. Go-getter. Traits companies big and small look for. And for good reason, you're being hired to do things! However, action is a secondary step that often overshadows the primary step, direction. Clear direction is the foundation that enables our actions to takeoff. Without it, we're stuck in the mud. Striving for clarity is an underrated skill. Having the courage to ask ( seemingly ) obvious questions, and to check in, making sure we're all on the same page. "O bvious " questions are a low risk, high reward way to add value. At worst, you'll add confidence to our actions. At best, you discover a misalignment that saves us from a dead-end. The more people, the more clear we need to be. The bigger the initiative, the bigger the risk of reaching the finish line, only to realize expectations were off. Success is always uncertain. But we can be certain about what we want and what everyone's job is. Things that can be clea...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer. Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong. "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail. "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on. When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...

Herman Ye

Search