ELI5: Stock Buybacks

Stock buybacks have been in the hot seat. Companies of all shapes and sizes are facing criticism for their "excessive" buyback programs.

Today we breakdown what buybacks are and if they're really as bad as people say.

What is a Stock Buyback?

A stock buyback is exactly what it sounds like. A company buys back stock. Also referred to as a shares repurchase. Done either by tender offer or in the open market.

A tender offer is a proposal to shareholders which outlines the number of shares a company is willing to buy and the price they are willing to buy for. Shareholders can either accept or decline. There's no obligation on their end.

More commonly, a company will simply repurchase shares in the open market.

Why Would a Company Buy Back Their Own Stock?

When companies have excess cash, buybacks are a way to distribute wealth to their shareholders. Buybacks reduce the number of outstanding shares, driving prices up and increasing shareholder value.

Another common way to distribute wealth is paying dividends. People loves dividends but buybacks are actually much more efficient as they don't trigger immediate tax consequences.

What's the Big Deal?

A lot of the critics believe repurchasing shares reduce innovation and economic investment. They argue, instead of buying back stock, companies should be spending on acquisitions, research, new projects and hiring.

Despite the criticism, there's little evidence suggesting any negative economic impact.

So Are They Bad?

Stock buybacks are simply a way to distribute wealth to shareholders. If companies determine there is no better use for their excess cash, it's better to give it to your shareholders than to invest in bad projects for the sake of it. Buybacks are just a tool, not good, not bad.

"Buybacks are divisive, they divide people who do understand finance from people who don't" - Professor Kenneth French

Comments

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event. Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback. Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes.

Bias For Clarity

Bias for action. Gets things done. Go-getter. Traits companies big and small look for. And for good reason, you're being hired to do things! However, action is a secondary step that often overshadows the primary step, direction. Clear direction is the foundation that enables our actions to takeoff. Without it, we're stuck in the mud. Striving for clarity is an underrated skill. Having the courage to ask ( seemingly ) obvious questions, and to check in, making sure we're all on the same page. "O bvious " questions are a low risk, high reward way to add value. At worst, you'll add confidence to our actions. At best, you discover a misalignment that saves us from a dead-end. The more people, the more clear we need to be. The bigger the initiative, the bigger the risk of reaching the finish line, only to realize expectations were off. Success is always uncertain. But we can be certain about what we want and what everyone's job is. Things that can be clea...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer. Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong. "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail. "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on. When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...

Herman Ye

Search