Skip to main content

ELI5: Stock Buybacks










Stock buybacks have been in the hot seat. Companies of all shapes and sizes are facing criticism for their "excessive" buyback programs.

Today we breakdown what buybacks are and if they're really as bad as people say.

What is a Stock Buyback?

A stock buyback is exactly what it sounds like. A company buys back stock. Also referred to as a shares repurchase. Done either by tender offer or in the open market.

A tender offer is a proposal to shareholders which outlines the number of shares a company is willing to buy and the price they are willing to buy for. Shareholders can either accept or decline. There's no obligation on their end.

More commonly, a company will simply repurchase shares in the open market.

Why Would a Company Buy Back Their Own Stock?

When companies have excess cash, buybacks are a way to distribute wealth to their shareholders. Buybacks reduce the number of outstanding shares, driving prices up and increasing shareholder value. 

Another common way to distribute wealth is paying dividends. People loves dividends but buybacks are actually much more efficient as they don't trigger immediate tax consequences. 

What's the Big Deal?

A lot of the critics believe repurchasing shares reduce innovation and economic investment. They argue, instead of buying back stock, companies should be spending on acquisitions, research, new projects and hiring.

Despite the criticism, there's little evidence suggesting any negative economic impact.

So Are They Bad?

Stock buybacks are simply a way to distribute wealth to shareholders. If companies determine there is no better use for their excess cash, it's better to give it to your shareholders than to invest in bad projects for the sake of it. Buybacks are just a tool, not good, not bad.

"Buybacks are divisive, they divide people who do understand finance from people who don't" - Professor Kenneth French





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today's Special: Humble Pie

You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark.  Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study  invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer.  Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong.  "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail.  "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on.  When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...

Starting Really Really Small

On your desk is one of the most intimidating sights known to man. A blank page. The prospect of filling it up with anything resembling decent seems insurmountable. Staring at the long road ahead fills you with anxiety and dread.  The first step is the most difficult. So we procrastinate. We " research ", we " prep ", we " plan ". We do everything except tackling the problem. We avoid the pain for as long as we can.  To make a blank page less intimidating. Tear it in half. There, half as scary, twice as easy. Still too much? Do it again. And again. Keep doing it until the task is so small that it's too easy not to do.  Getting starting is the hardest part. So make the hardest part as easy as possible. This doesn't guarantee amazing results, but it gets you in the game. You can't win if you don't play.