Why I Always Use a Limit Order

When buying stocks, there are two main type of orders: Market Orders and Limit Orders. Let's discuss what these are and which is best for most investors.

Market Orders

Market orders are the simplest kind. You're buying at whatever the current price is. You're agnostic to it and just want your stocks! Given the limited restrictions, these orders offer the greatest likelihood of fulfillment....but this comes at a cost.

Given the lack of limits, you could end up paying much more than expected. Markets are volatile, prices can sharply shoot up out of nowhere. Passively accepting the market price opens you up to the risk going into margin (negative balance), leading you to owe money and face interest charges.

Limit Orders

Limit orders, as the name implies, places a limit on the price you're willing to pay. Your order will only be filled if it's within your limits. This provides more certainty. Whichever way the markets moves, it's guaranteed that you won't pay more than your limit, allowing you to size your order appropriately.

Best of Both Worlds

A great way to combine the fillability of Market Orders with the assurance of Limit Orders is to do what is called a Marketable Limit Order. These are limit orders that are expected to be filled immediately due to how they are placed.

How to do a Marketable Limit Order:

When Buying - Set your limit price at 2 cents above the current ask price (the price sellers are asking for).

When Selling - Set your limit price at 2 cents below the current bid price (the price buyers are bidding with).

Because you are placing your order a bit above the asking price (or a bit lower the bid price when selling) you can expect your order to fill immediately as the few cents difference acts as a buffer for market movements. This is how I buy all my ETFs and it always leads to a speedy and safe order.

Comments

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event. Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback. Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes.

Bias For Clarity

Bias for action. Gets things done. Go-getter. Traits companies big and small look for. And for good reason, you're being hired to do things! However, action is a secondary step that often overshadows the primary step, direction. Clear direction is the foundation that enables our actions to takeoff. Without it, we're stuck in the mud. Striving for clarity is an underrated skill. Having the courage to ask ( seemingly ) obvious questions, and to check in, making sure we're all on the same page. "O bvious " questions are a low risk, high reward way to add value. At worst, you'll add confidence to our actions. At best, you discover a misalignment that saves us from a dead-end. The more people, the more clear we need to be. The bigger the initiative, the bigger the risk of reaching the finish line, only to realize expectations were off. Success is always uncertain. But we can be certain about what we want and what everyone's job is. Things that can be clea...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer. Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong. "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail. "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on. When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...

Herman Ye

Search