Skip to main content

Sit Down, Be Humble: Overconfidence & Investing

man jumping on the middle of the street during daytime

We humans are notorious for overestimating our abilities. We're a cocky bunch. Let's take a look at how big our heads really are and its influence on our finances.

Apparently, We're All Above Average

A 1977 study found that 90% of college professors believed they had above average teaching abilities. With two-thirds believing they were in the top quartile.

A 1981 study found that 80%-90% of college students ranked their driving abilities as above average.

A 2000 study found that 87% of Stanford MBA candidates believed their academic performance was above average.

So, we're all above average?

Obviously that can't be the case. Math doesn't work that way! These are examples of illusory superiority, the tendency for us to irrationally overestimate our abilities.

There are many more studies like these; demonstrating how we think we're more athletic, more beautiful, and have more potential than the "average person".

Overconfidence and Investing 

Overconfidence runs rampant in investing. We all think we're smarter, have better information, and are more skilled than the rest.

"Buy Telsa, trust me, you'll be rich."

"The recession is coming, trust me, we're due, sell everything!"  

Nobody can predict the future. Thinking you can will just lead to poor decisions. People overly confident in their stock picking ability will fail to diversify properly. People who think they can time the market will end up sitting on cash, missing gains while they wait for a recession to come.

The cockiest among us tend to trade more, raking up unnecessary fees and exposing themselves to costly mistakes. A 2000 study examined thousands of accounts over a 5 year period and found that the more investors traded, the worse their performance. The most active traders earned an annual return of 11.4%, at a time when the market returned 17.9%. Not great.

But I Do Really Well, I Swear! 

You might have had some success, sure. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Given how unpredictable and competitive markets are, these fortunate events were most likely a result of luck rather than skill.

Investors have selective memories and irrational interpretations of outcomes. Remembering (and bragging about) the wins and conveniently overlooking losses (unless you're r/wallstreetbets). We tend to attribute wins as a display of skill, while losses as freak accidents.

We also suffer from hindsight bias. In hindsight, it's easy to convince ourselves that we knew the housing market would sky rocket and that Facebook would rise 400%. Hindsight bias contributes to overconfidence by making us think investing is more predictable and controllable than it really is.

Conclusion

It's easy to fall into the overconfidence trap. The key is to take a step back when assessing your skills and outcomes. Analyze with these biases in mind, question assumptions, and ask for second opinions. Doing this, you'll be able to dampen your inherit overconfidence to make more rational decisions. Stay humble out there.









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event.  Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback.  Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes. 

Bias For Clarity

Bias for action. Gets things done. Go-getter. Traits companies big and small look for. And for good reason, you're being hired to do things! However, action is a secondary step that often overshadows the primary step, direction.   Clear direction is the foundation that enables our actions to takeoff. Without it, we're stuck in the mud.  Striving for clarity is an underrated skill. Having the courage to ask ( seemingly ) obvious questions, and to check in, making sure we're all on the same page. "O bvious " questions are a low risk, high reward way to add value. At worst, you'll add confidence to our actions. At best, you discover a misalignment that saves us from a dead-end.  The more people, the more clear we need to be. The bigger the initiative, the bigger the risk of reaching the finish line, only to realize expectations were off.  Success is always uncertain. But we can be certain about what we want and what everyone's job is. Things that can be clea...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study  invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer.  Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong.  "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail.  "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on.  When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...