Skip to main content

Quick Math - The Rule of 72

1 U.S.A dollar banknotes

Have you ever wondered how long it would take for you to double your money? The rule of 72 is a neat math trick to calculate this. This simple formula requires only one input, your expected rate of return.

Just divide it by 72 and bam! You got it.

# of Years to Double = 72/Annual Rate of Return 

Putting the Rule in Action - Danny's Double

Danny has $5,000 to invest, with the goal of one day growing it to $10,000. He's planning on investing into a portfolio of low-cost stock ETFs.

Stocks typically averages an annual return of 7%, assuming he'll experience the same, how long would it take for his money to double?

Using the rule of 72, we find that it'll take about:

72/7 = 10.29 Years

So easy!

Flipping it Around

10 years is a long time, Danny was hoping to double his money in 5 years.

Luckily, we can flip the rule around to find the return he'd need to achieve this.

Annual Rate of Return = 72/# of Years to Double

Plugging in the numbers, we find Danny will need a return of:

72/5 = 14.4% 

That's a pretty high return, even for stocks. Not impossible but definitely not something to count on. Danny's best bet would be to save more instead of hoping for higher than average returns.

Conclusion

The rule of 72 is a great tool, but it's not perfect, it's simply a rule of thumb. So for serious financial planning, you'll want the most accurate numbers. Though not fully accurate, it does get pretty darn close, especially when it comes to lower rates.

Rate of ReturnRule of 72
(Years)
Exact Number
(Years)
Accuracy Rate
1%7269.6696.75%
2%363597.22%
5%14.414.2198.68%
10%7.27.2799.04%
20%3.63.894.74%
50%1.441.7184.21%
100%0.72172.00%

















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event.  Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback.  Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes. 

Today's Special: Humble Pie

You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark.  Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study  invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer.  Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong.  "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail.  "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on.  When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...