Quick Math - The Rule of 72

Have you ever wondered how long it would take for you to double your money? The rule of 72 is a neat math trick to calculate this. This simple formula requires only one input, your expected rate of return.

Just divide it by 72 and bam! You got it.

# of Years to Double = 72/Annual Rate of Return

Putting the Rule in Action - Danny's Double

Danny has $5,000 to invest, with the goal of one day growing it to $10,000. He's planning on investing into a portfolio of low-cost stock ETFs.

Stocks typically averages an annual return of 7%, assuming he'll experience the same, how long would it take for his money to double?

Using the rule of 72, we find that it'll take about:

72/7 = 10.29 Years

So easy!

Flipping it Around

10 years is a long time, Danny was hoping to double his money in 5 years.

Luckily, we can flip the rule around to find the return he'd need to achieve this.

Annual Rate of Return = 72/# of Years to Double

Plugging in the numbers, we find Danny will need a return of:

72/5 = 14.4%

That's a pretty high return, even for stocks. Not impossible but definitely not something to count on. Danny's best bet would be to save more instead of hoping for higher than average returns.

Conclusion

The rule of 72 is a great tool, but it's not perfect, it's simply a rule of thumb. So for serious financial planning, you'll want the most accurate numbers. Though not fully accurate, it does get pretty darn close, especially when it comes to lower rates.

Rate of Return	Rule of 72 (Years)	Exact Number (Years)	Accuracy Rate
1%	72	69.66	96.75%
2%	36	35	97.22%
5%	14.4	14.21	98.68%
10%	7.2	7.27	99.04%
20%	3.6	3.8	94.74%
50%	1.44	1.71	84.21%
100%	0.72	1	72.00%

Comments

Today's Special: Humble Pie

You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark. Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...

Starting Really Really Small

On your desk is one of the most intimidating sights known to man. A blank page. The prospect of filling it up with anything resembling decent seems insurmountable. Staring at the long road ahead fills you with anxiety and dread. The first step is the most difficult. So we procrastinate. We " research ", we " prep ", we " plan ". We do everything except tackling the problem. We avoid the pain for as long as we can. To make a blank page less intimidating. Tear it in half. There, half as scary, twice as easy. Still too much? Do it again. And again. Keep doing it until the task is so small that it's too easy not to do. Getting starting is the hardest part. So make the hardest part as easy as possible. This doesn't guarantee amazing results, but it gets you in the game. You can't win if you don't play.

Why We Shouldn't Be Afraid of Ambiguity

Ambiguity. That fuzzy monster that chases us down darkened hallways, whispering doubts about our roadmap and feature sets. You know the feeling. You constantly wrestle with unknowns: Will users like this? Is this the right direction? Frankly, if you had a nickel for every time the answer wasn't crystal clear, well, you might actually want to chase that ambiguity down the hall. But here's the thing: ambiguity isn't your enemy. It's your dance partner. Innovation rarely happens in a land of perfect clarity. Sure, there's a time for well-defined processes. But when you're creating something new, there are bound to be more questions than answers. The key is to learn to waltz with the unknown . Embrace the experiment. Don't be afraid to throw some spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks. Focus on outcomes, not outputs. Don't get hung up on features. What problem are you trying to solve? How will you measure success? Get comfortable with "go...

Herman Ye

Search