Mug Madness, The Endowment Effect and Your Finances

white and blue striped ceramic mug near white painted wall

In a 1991 study, researchers randomly divided Cornell University students into two groups. One were gifted mugs, the other received nothing. The fortunate group were asked how much they're willing to sell the mug for. The mug-less were asked how much they were willing to pay.

Points scored

The owners were unwilling to sell for anything less than $5.25. The buyers on the other hand, were unwilling to pay more than $2.75. The seller's expectation was almost twice the buyer's market. This is a classic example of the endowment effect, the tendency for us to irrationally overvalue items we own.

A 2000 study demonstrated an even greater expression of the endowment effect. Duke University conducts a lottery for basketball tickets before critical games, as demand greatly exceeds supply. After one of these lotteries, researches called up a random group of winners and losers to ask about selling and buying prices respectively.

Points scored

Sellers on average expected over $2,400 for their tickets, while buyers valued the tickets at less than $200.

By overvaluing our assets, we create an inflated view of reality. We end up holding onto assets for longer than rational. Not wanting to leave money on the table, we hold onto them until we receive an offer that meets our rich expectations.

The endowment effect clouds our judgement and leads to poor financial decisions. In investing, we stubbornly hold onto bad stocks. When selling our home, we unwisely pass up fair offers.

When making sell decisions, do your best to eliminate the emotional attachment to your assets. Ask yourself "If I didn't own this already, what would I pay for it?". Habing a realistic view of your assets is essential for financial planning and decision making. Otherwise you'll never sell what you should and end up thinking your financial health is twice as good as it actually is!

Comments

The Art of Giving Feedback

Constructive feedback is an awkward affair. You don't want hurt feelings, but recognize the importance of honesty. You've tried the classic "hoping things will get better on its own" and unfortunately it hasn't played out. When giving feedback, here are a few things that I try to keep it mind. Start with empathy. Step into their shoes and understand their story. If you don't know, ask. Be genuinely curious. Feedback is a dynamic affair. Shared communication with a shared goal towards progress. Take the emotion out of it. Focus on the situation, not the person. Focusing on the person adds unnecessary weight to an already emotionally-bloated event. Be specific. Give clear examples. Vague feedback equals dismissed feedback. Doing above won't de-awkward things fully, but it will dampen it and increase the chance of better outcomes.

Bias For Clarity

Bias for action. Gets things done. Go-getter. Traits companies big and small look for. And for good reason, you're being hired to do things! However, action is a secondary step that often overshadows the primary step, direction. Clear direction is the foundation that enables our actions to takeoff. Without it, we're stuck in the mud. Striving for clarity is an underrated skill. Having the courage to ask ( seemingly ) obvious questions, and to check in, making sure we're all on the same page. "O bvious " questions are a low risk, high reward way to add value. At worst, you'll add confidence to our actions. At best, you discover a misalignment that saves us from a dead-end. The more people, the more clear we need to be. The bigger the initiative, the bigger the risk of reaching the finish line, only to realize expectations were off. Success is always uncertain. But we can be certain about what we want and what everyone's job is. Things that can be clea...

Negative Feedback, Positive Lessons

In the battle against plastic bags, a five-cent tax was shown to be much more successful at deterring usage than a five-cent credit for bringing your own bags. Carrots satisfy but sticks sting, and they sting hard. So we default to the less painful choice of avoiding loss. Loss aversion impacts the way we process information. A 2019 study invited participants to learn through a series of multiple choice questions. Each question only had two options to choose from. Whether guessing correctly or not, they would still learn the right answer. Despite the identical learning opportunity, participants were much more successful at recalling the answers they guessed correctly than those they got wrong. "You're right!" feels good. We savour the moment, analyzing every detail. "You're wrong!" stings. We want to quickly forget, dismiss, and move on. When we succumb to loss aversion, we miss opportunities to learn. Failure is part of the process. We'll experie...

Herman Ye

Search