Skip to main content

So You Think You Can Trade? Active Vs. Passive Investing

Image
By
Space Grey Ipad Air With Graph on Brown Wooden Table

 My first job out of school was working in compliance for an investment firm.  Compliance ensures a firm is meeting regulatory expectations (following the rules). It's an interesting position to be in, you need to be on top of everything. You work with nearly every department. Dealing with traders, research analysts, investment bankers, never a dull moment.

What amazed me working here was how much effort went into every investment decision. Teams of super-bright people (CFAs, MBAs, PhDs and the like) constantly analyzing companies, industries and the greater economy. Company visits, conference calls, mulling over financial statements, research reports, the 24/7 newsfeed, the work never stops.

This tremendous effort is not uncommon in the investment industry. It's the standard. It is a highly competitive environment. You might have a team of brilliant people equipped with the newest technology, but so does the firm down the street.

Having said all that, it is still very common for the average person to think they can pick stocks and compete with the pros. This is not sensible. You're at a massive disadvantage in terms of time, experience, manpower, information, technology, just to name a few. Your Robinhood account and tips from Reddit won't cut it.

Even most professionals fail to outperform the market. A 2016 study by S&P found that "over the 10-year investment horizon, 82.14 percent of large-cap managers, 87.61 percent of mid-cap managers, and 88.42 percent of small-cap managers failed to outperform (their index benchmarks) on a relative basis." Markets are just too unpredictable and competitive to win consistently.

Luckily there is alternative to stock picking, passive investing. Unlike active investing which involves research, analysis and frequent trading in hopes of outsmarting the market, passive investing is about being the market.

A major component of passive investing are exchange-traded funds (ETFs). ETFs allow you buy a large basket of individual stocks or bonds in a single fund in order to track an entire economic sector or index such as the S&P 500.

If done correctly, ETFs are a great way to build a portfolio that simply mirrors the overall market. Given that over 80% of professionals underperform market returns, achieving market returns (with significantly less effort) is a huge win!





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Today's Special: Humble Pie

By
You champion a project, fight for an idea, and then...reality sets in. That churning in your stomach isn't butterflies, it's the realization you've missed the mark.  Pride will puff up your chest, and kick in the "defend at all costs" instinct. But arguing with the umpire never changed a call. Admitting you're wrong isn't a sign of weakness. It can strengthen your professional standing. In a world obsessed with the illusion of infallibility, the courage to adjust course is a breath of fresh air. It shows you're confident enough to be wrong, and adaptable enough to learn from it. Do your research, think critically, and stand behind your decisions. But when the data whispers (or screams) otherwise, don't be afraid to swallow that slice of humble pie. Be the first to acknowledge. Don't wait for someone to point out your mistake. Be open, take responsibility, and most importantly, focus on what you're going to do to address it. Don't dwell ...
Post a Comment
Read more

When Perfect Becomes a Problem: The iCar Story

By
Let's talk about Apple's iCar, or rather, the ghost of it. A decade. Ten billion dollars. Poof. Gone. Like a puff of smoke from a dream that never quite woke up. They wanted to launch a revolution, a fully-formed, flawless chariot. But revolutions aren't born in secret labs; they're forged in the messy, chaotic crucible of the real world. You don't build a movement by hiding in the shadows. You don't create a product people love by ignoring them. You don't change the world by waiting for perfection. It's about the minimum viable. It's about shipping early, shipping often, and listening—really listening—to the people you're trying to serve. Apple built a cathedral of secrecy. A monument to what might have been. And then, they tore it down.  They spent billions on a dream, while ignoring the simple truth: the market doesn't care about your dreams. It cares about solutions. It cares about things that work. So, here's the lesson: stop chasing...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why We Shouldn't Be Afraid of Ambiguity

By
Ambiguity. That fuzzy monster that chases us down darkened hallways, whispering doubts about our roadmap and feature sets. You know the feeling. You constantly wrestle with unknowns: Will users like this? Is this the right direction? Frankly, if you had a nickel for every time the answer wasn't crystal clear, well, you might actually want to chase that ambiguity down the hall. But here's the thing: ambiguity isn't your enemy. It's your dance partner. Innovation rarely happens in a land of perfect clarity. Sure, there's a time for well-defined processes. But when you're creating something new, there are bound to be more questions than answers. The key is to learn to waltz with the unknown .  Embrace the experiment. Don't be afraid to throw some spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks.  Focus on outcomes, not outputs. Don't get hung up on features. What problem are you trying to solve? How will you measure success? Get comfortable with "go...
Post a Comment
Read more